![]() ![]() Of course, the recess for the webcam in the upper area is still noticeable, which does not have any drawbacks, at least not functionally. The display edges are relatively narrow, although there are Windows devices with even thinner edges. The maximum opening angle is, as usual, around 130 degrees. Stability is very good and neither the base unit nor the display lid can be warped in any way. Then again, the overall height is practically identical at 11.5 mm, and due to the larger case, the new MBA 15 appears even thinner than its smaller sibling. In the next few days we'll also take a closer look at the base model with 8 GB and the 256 GB SSD.Īpple has kept the design of the small MacBook Air 13 unchanged for its 15-inch model only the footprint is slightly larger. Today's test device houses a 1 TB SSD and 16 GB RAM for a grand total of EUR 2289 (~US$2500). The second basic model offers 512 GB SSD storage, but costs a whopping US$200 more at $1499.00. The remaining specs are sobering, however, as there is only 8 GB of RAM and a small 256 GB SSD. The starting price is US$1299.00 and, in contrast to the smaller 13-inch model, the Air 15 is only available with the faster M2 SoC that offers 10 GPU cores. there is no HDR support or ProMotion (120 Hz). The display is of course larger at 15.3 inches, but the specs remain the same, i.e. This essentially means that you have to do without a new processor and get the familiar M2 SoC from last year, which is again passively cooled. With the new MacBook Air 15, Apple is now offering a larger MacBook for everyday use, which technically is an almost perfect copy of the smaller MacBook Air 13. This offers a lot of performance, but many users do not need it at all and, above all, the MBP 16 is comparatively bulky and expensive. Negative comments must be taken seriously, at least show the courtesy of describing the circumstances in as much detail as there is.Apple has finally introduced the large MacBook Air, thus filling a large gap in its product portfolio, because anyone who previously wanted a large MacBook had to go for the MacBook Pro 16. We're Mac users, not Pee Cee users, just run Apple System Profiler before posting catastrophic comments that must be taken seriously. One more small request - then tell us why Apple's beta testers didn't do their jobs.Īm I asking too much? Look. Or, maybe you're 100% right and it crashes every newly bought unmodified Mac! If a particular upgrader is going to hose every mackers directory, at least post how you configured your Mac so we'll know which Macs will be affected. Maybe you forgot to unplug all the firewire cables, maybe you have some bizzare PCI card, maybe you're running SCSI. To those heros out there who sacrifice their macs to determine that an upgrader "sucks, crashes, and erases everything", how about going to System Profiler and post everything you have on your Mac prior to performing the catastrophic upgrade. Then the next upgrader comes along and what's the first comment? "It sucks, crashes, and destroys everything." Were there no beta testers? Granted, it's useless to ask anyone from Apple. ![]() postings are taken seriously enough that I, for one, will skip the upgrade and wait on the the next. These "it sucks, crashes, and destroyed my directory" etc. ![]() Some qualify what they post, some just post that "it sucks and crashes." On just about every one of these Apple upgraders, someone or more than one macker posts negative comments. So what's the bottom line? Incompatible with PPOE and DSL? Is this an upgrade to be skipped? Yes? No? Maybe? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |